The given bar charts provide insights into four various nations in 1970 and 2000 in terms of the number of employed males and females ranging in age from 60 to 64.
Looking from the overall perspective, it can be seen that in both two years, the proportion of male employers always dominated the females and the most obvious disparity between males and females can be observed in Belgium.
In more detail, in 1970, the USA was the only nation holding the lion's share, with roughly 86% men and 78% women. It was followed by Indonesia and Belgium, with 85% and 78% men, in turn, and the number of female workers in the two nations was nearly equal at 65%. Moreover, in Japan, the figure for men and women were the lowest, with 75% males and 55% females.
Turning to the year 2000, in the USA, the figure for men was just 78%, which ranked first, nearly double the figure for female workers, with 41%. Moreover, in Belgium, there were considerably low figures for both men and women, with 52% males and only 8% females. The proportion of men in Indonesia was about 71%, while the percentage of females was 50%. Finally, the smallest discrepancy can be observed in Japan, with 51% male employers and 48% in terms of women.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the i 95
- The tables below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 67
- The diagrams below show a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 summarize the information by selecting main features etc 73
- The bar chart below shows the average percentage of new secondary school graduates enrolling in university in 2010 2015 and 2020 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, look, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5799086758 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25147959339 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529680365297 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0425535494 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138251669834 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697527111816 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454925227477 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965771313285 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570196256965 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.