The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">The provided bar chart illustrates the comparison of people who consumed five serving of fruit and vegetables the UK between 2001 and 2008.
Overall, it can be seen that men, women and children showed to increase and then fluctuated over a seven year period.
According to the data,in 2001, women ate them approximately 20% which means that double than the proportion of children while men just consumed them about 15% .After 5 years later, eating food and vegetables icreased by 5% slightly in men and children whereas there was a significant growth of about 10% in women's rate.
If we look at between 2005 and 2008, the percantage of women rose by 5% before decreasing by 5% and then 3% in 2006,2007 and 2008.Also, in the proportion of men ,having remained stable at roughly 27% between 2005 and 2006,figure then declined marginally in 2008.In addition, children's rate increased to % 26% and then decreased sligtly to 25% in the end of the period.</span><br>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-30 | MichaelP | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | cutecutecue | view | |
| 2021-08-15 | nami | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | prathamp114 | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | rojababa | 73 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. 11
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 56
- Some people think that cars is the best wat to tavel in cities while others believe a bicycle is better way. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...en year period. According to the data,in 2001, women ate them approximately 20% ...
^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n while men just consumed them about 15% .After 5 years later, eating food and veg...
^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...while men just consumed them about 15% .After 5 years later, eating food and vegetabl...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2008, the percantage of women rose by 5% before decreasing by 5% and then 3% in 2...
^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...by 5% and then 3% in 2006,2007 and 2008.Also, in the proportion of men ,having remai...
^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... and 2008.Also, in the proportion of men ,having remained stable at roughly 27% be...
^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...figure then declined marginally in 2008.In addition, childrens rate increased to %...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, then, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17682926829 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30942389267 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670731707317 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.688526114 43.030603864 243% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 212.25 112.824112599 188% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.0 22.9334400587 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.25 5.23603664747 253% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16464829324 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102973540761 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100765135774 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102973540761 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100765135774 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.5 13.2329268293 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.