the chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
The graph provides data on the ratio of people who consumed five portion of vegetables and fruits in daily meal in the UK over 8-year period.
Overall, it can be seen that people ratio who consumed of vegetables and fruits are generally increased and percentage of women always higher than man and children over the period shown.
Looking the men and women ratio in more detail, it is evident that the women ratio stood at %20 in 2001 and this number increased to approximately %35, which is the highest number on the graph, in 2006 and then it is decreased. Percentage of men who ate vegetables and fruits started at nearly %17 in 2001. This ratio has stayed same point from 2001 to 2003 and then it increased at almost %27 until 2007.
Turning to the children ratio, it can be clear that the percentage of children started at nearly %13 which is the lowest point on the graph and it reached at %23 in 2008. Furthermore, ratio of children is slightly lower than men ratio in 2007 at %25 and %27 respectively.
- the chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 67
- the pie charts below show the comparision of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 61
- the charts below give information about levels of education in glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010 73
- the tables below shows information and provide predictions regarding the change in percentage of population aged 65 and obove in three countries. 61
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today, while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human's life. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...man and children over the period shown. Looking the men and women ratio in more ...
^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tarted at nearly %17 in 2001. This ratio has stayed same point from 2001 to 2003 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54644808743 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42003097334 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491803278689 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2109834313 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209150882813 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120108416223 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106695203606 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147998424342 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798883354875 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.