The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
The bar chart displays the percentage of women, men and children consuming five serving of vegetables and fruits from 2001 till 2008 in the UK.
Overall, it can be seen that women detain the highest percentage of fruit and vegetables consuming, while children accounted for the lowest proportion. Furthermore, an important increase in the proportion of people eating these food elements can be seen over the period given.
The percentage of woman who ate fruits and vegetables started slightly above 20% in 2001. this figure rose steadily until 2006 where it reaches the highest peak of around 35%, before having a downturn and achieve 30% in 2008.
In term of men and children eating fruits and vegetables, the rate remained stable for the first three years ( about 17% and 12% respectively). From this point, men group climbed gently to reach about 27% in 2007, after this dropped to 26% in 2008. A similar growth happens to children's figure, hitting 25% in 2007 and around 24% in 2008.
- the line chart below shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital city of a particular country.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- People sleep less than before in many countries. why people sleep less? what effect does it have individually and in society 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 84
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...les started slightly above 20% in 2001. this figure rose steadily until 2006 where i...
^^^^
Line 19, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emained stable for the first three years about 17% and 12% respectively. From thi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04790419162 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49411081602 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646706586826 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.232520311 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.375 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274109647394 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117321429729 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122972124017 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177456316238 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116575695329 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.