the tables below shows information and provide predictions regarding the change in percentage of population aged 65 and obove in three countries.
The table provide data on changing of percentage of people who was 65 and older for Canada, Germany and the UK in 3 separate years.
Overall, it can be seen that ratio of people in aged 65 and older in all countries is increased from 1988 and 2000 and this ratio is expecting the raise for 2030.
Looking to the data in 1998 and 2000 in more detail it is evident that people ratio in Germany in 2000 was higher than the UK and Canada, at 25.32%, 14.89% and 20.67% respectively. In addition, 14.23% of people who lived in the UK in 1988 is the lowest point on the table.
Turning to the forecast data, it can be clear that, ratio of aged 65 and above people who are living in Canada will reach 26.35%. Furthermore, 30.42% of elder people in Germany is higher compared to 20.35% of the UK.
- Some people think that the governments is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree with this view? 56
- Some people think that the governments is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree with this view? 56
- Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
- the pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to US between 1998 and 2000. 67
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, in city Scothland, in 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a will reach 26.35%. Furthermore, 30.42% of elder people in Germany is higher com...
^^
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people in Germany is higher compared to 20.35% of the UK.
^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in Germany is higher compared to 20.35% of the UK.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 643.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.28666666667 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23432813665 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 187.2 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4846565194 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.166666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.091141205934 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526276462821 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689841690866 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747777409911 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723854438607 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.9 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.