The chart below shows the percentage of people who own devices from 2010 to 2025.
The line graph given illustrates the information about how many people had four various equipment, namely smartphone, laptop, smartwatch, tablet over the course 15 years from 2010 to 2025.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there was the same level in the possession of the laptop while the others saw an upward trend in the number of people used in the period.
In 2010, the laptops ranked the highest in the rate of consumption, approximately 60 people, while only 40 users, the smartphones stood at the second. The rate of people possessed tablets was lower, around 20 users. The tablet was the least most popular at this time, just only 2 people.
As for tablets, the figure went up by 30 consumers, from 20 users to 50 users. Subsequently, the rate is predicted to have grown in 2020, around 60 users until 2040 when it will decrease significantly, just over 55 people. This was the same for the smartphone's proportion. After rising to 60 users in 2015, it is anticipated to increase sharply until 2020, around 79 users. By 2040, it is expected that this number will rocket to the highest rate of 88 owners.
Regarding the consumption of the smartwatches, there was a slight growth in 2015, about 6 users before going up a high rate in 2020, about 20 people. The forecast is that the possession of this device will boom to twice times, approximately 40 users. Besides, the figure for laptops ownership saw a record high in 2015, around 70 people. However, this number is predicted to decline significantly in 2040, about 58 users.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The graph shows data for annual sales revenue or turnover for three outdoor clothing companies from 2004 and 2014. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of tourists to Thailand who visited four different attractions in Bangkok 69
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.» Write at least 150 word 78
- The chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 78
- THE GRAPH BELOW SHOWS IN PERCENTAGE TERMS THE CHANGING PATTERNS OF DOMESTIC ACCESS TO MODERN TECHNOLOGY IN HOMES IN THE UK 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, regarding, second, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76296296296 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67340711904 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4062442607 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8571428571 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0818733698683 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284445205267 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399188547016 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586577931908 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454856258349 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.