The chart below shows the percentage of young people at universities in six countries, in 2000 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given information is about the proportion of young demos at varsities in six nations, in 2000 and 2007, is depicted by rendered bar graph.
At the cursory glance of the graph, it is enough to make clear that, In Italy, UK and Poland the percentage of youth enrolled in universities increased over the time. However, In 2000, 38% of the Italian youth and 46% of the American youth studied at universities and both these kingdoms saw a rise of 14% and 6% respectively in the next seven years. Similarly, In the Poland the percentage of youth enrolled increased from 64% to 78%.
It is further evident that, Spain and Norway witnessed a small decline in the proportion of youth in universities. Nevertheless, In 2000, the proportion of Spanish youth is fell from 46% to 41% and in Norway the percentage decline between 66% and 65%. Beside this, the percentage of Finnish youth in universities remained same at 70%.
Overall, the most striking factor is emerge from the graph is that, Finland had the maximum proportion of youth enrolled in universities in 2000 while in 2007 the maximum percentage was from Poland. There was change in the proportion of youth studying in universities in all countries except Finland.
- The chart below shows the percentage of young people at universities in six countries in 2000 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The chart below shows the percentage of young people at universities in six countries in 2000 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The bar char shows an active participation rate in top ten sports in USA in 1998 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- Some people believe the aim of university education is to help graduates get better jobs Others believe there are much wider benefits of university education for both individuals and society Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should not have to pay tax to the state To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84653465347 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77918605176 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490099009901 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6727326021 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178671496378 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860184316566 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552912332148 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128145567056 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482824053272 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.