The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Australia.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares differences among native people and migrants to visit various places such as zoo, library, theatre and cinema in percentage. Also, the migrants were categorized in two types: migrants who born in English-speaking countries (MESC) and other migrants.
With the first glance, cinema was in favor of all types of people especially local one and after that MESC, about 70 and 65 percent respectively. However, in the case of migrants born in other countries go to library was the most priority maybe to promote their language knowledge or other qualities.
The least amount of interest was theatre with fewer than 25% for all groups and new migrants born in other countries about 10%. For MESC, after cinema with about 65%, zoo was likely to visit around 50% and library 40%.
All in all, local people and MESC have almost similar trend for all places whereas migrants who were not born in English-spoken countries have more tendency toward library.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-08 | tr_h.20 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | RIYA MODI | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | baotrammm | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | kien150199 | view | |
| 2023-07-15 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- It is better for young to get advice from old people than young people Do you agree or disagree 61
- Living In A Country Where You Have To Speak A Foreign Language Can Cause Serious Social And Practical Problems 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Alternative energy sources that use the natural power of the wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03726708075 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57070833374 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583850931677 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.5282011787 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.066422964702 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376760082425 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053740432217 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0458404023342 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351993142846 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.