The bar chart gives information on the four destinations chosen by residents of Canada under different category. The total population is broadly divided into three: people born in Canada, New migrants from English speaking countries and migrants from countries where English is not a native language.
Overall, Canadians as well as new migrants from English speaking countries preferred Cinema over any other leisure activities. However, over half percentage of migrants born in other countries were interested to visit Library with Cinema being their second place of interest. Theatre is the least preferred entertainment for all the three category of people residing in Canada.
Exactly 70% of natives in Canada used Cinema as a source of entertainment compared to roughly 60% for new migrants from English speaking countries and 50% for migrants from other countries. Surprisingly, out of all the three categories, migrants from countries where English is not a native language, showed interest in Library than any other destinations. However, only 10% of this population visited theatre for entertainments.
More than the 15% of the population of migrants from English speaking country visited zoo than new migrants from other countries.
- Advances in science and technology and other areas of society in the last 100 years have transformed the way we live as well as postponing the day we die There is no better time to be alive than now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinio
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 61
- The graph below shows the number of trips made by children in one country to travel to school in 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55263157895 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89229083261 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2618363 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.222222222 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0981121770861 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549663519339 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419663831779 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715537097716 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425734363151 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.