The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar graph gives information about different venues which were chosen to go by three categories of groups in Canada.
Overall, cinema took up the highest proportion. There was a reverse pattern in the figure of citizens visiting the theater. However, immigrants from non-English-speaking countries were keen on going to see the library rather than other places.
It can be seen that cinema was the most popular visiting place, accounting for more than 50% in the selection of each group of the Canadian. In contrast, theater took up the lowest percentage of all these places, with 25% migrants from English-speaking countries, followed by 20% of native Canadian, and just 10% migrants from other countries.
Turning to other places, immigrants from non-English-speaking regions used to frequent the library, at about 55% although 40% from English-speaking countries and over 37% of native Canadian visited there. Moreover, the statistics show that the zoo was also a popular place which comprised 50% of English-speaking migrants and over 43% of non-migrants and approximately 35% of non-English-speaking migrants.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-12 | hannahbui | 11 | view |
2021-10-12 | hannahbui | 11 | view |
2021-09-29 | muhammad Hamza | 70 | view |
2021-09-29 | muhammad Hamza | view | |
2021-08-13 | priynnk1663 | 73 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should wr 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own 61
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...on-English-speaking countries were keen on going to see the library rather than other pl...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56395348837 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55762175135 2.65546596893 134% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645348837209 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3425627301 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.625 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0718474686525 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352410368915 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322988033434 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0496057942827 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241529399567 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.