The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art-related subjects at a UK university in 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This bar chart compares the figures for male and female learners participating in several art-related fields from Linguistics to Communication and Media Stud at a UK university in 2011.
This chart displays that females were more in the quantity of almost subjects than males, except Art and Design. Besides, English language and Literature were most common subjects of both male and female students.
Specifically, woman learners were most interested in English language and literature taking up exactly 250 students. İn Linguistics, Communication and Media Stud they were around 240 and 230 students.
By contrast, History and Archeology and Philosophy seemed to be not attractive to both male and females. However, in Philosophy student statistic of male were nearly three times lower than female that stayed at the bottom of the list with aproximately 50 people. İn art and Design the male students overtook females in the number of participations by more or less 20 students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-07 | tomtitnhim@ | 69 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | Nguyễn Yến Linh | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | nandir | 10 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | nandir | view | |
| 2021-11-15 | Prakreeti | 72 | view |
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 10
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ud they were around 240 and 230 students By contrast History and Archeology and P...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23870967742 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87906794954 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 155.0 22.4926829268 689% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 812.0 112.824112599 720% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 155.0 22.9334400587 676% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 38.0 5.23603664747 726% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225470228302 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.225470228302 0.103423049105 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140735307899 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058907794634 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 80.8 13.2329268293 611% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -94.31 61.2550243902 -154% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 64.9 10.3012195122 630% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.3 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.09 8.06136585366 187% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 11.4329268293 542% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 64.0 10.9970731707 582% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 62.0 11.0658536585 560% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.