The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
The bar chart compares the percentage of researches in coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Overall, it can been clear seen that, there was the highest percentage of going to cafe for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks in Melbourne whereas the smallest percentage of people bought fresh coffee in last 4 weeks in Brisbane.
According to the bar chart, we can see that in Adelaide around 50% of people went to a cafe for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks. However, in Hobart it was about 38%. Approximately 53% of people bought instant coffee in last 4 weeks in Brisbane and it was one of the highest percentages while in Sydney it accounted for just over 45%.
The second highest percentage of buying fresh coffee in last 4 weeks in Melbourne was just under 45% but in Hobart it was around 38%. The only similarity between the people who bought instant coffee and went to a cafe for coffee in last 4 weeks was the percentage that was around 50% and about 49%.
- The chart gives information about Southland s main export s in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart shows the proportion of graduetes from Bluesky University in 2006 entering different employment sectors 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 67
- The table below summarises some data collected by a college bookshop for the month of February 2000 100
- The chart below shows the results of survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'can be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: can be; has been
... five Australian cities. Overall, it can been clear seen that, there was the highest ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4861878453 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4337502582 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430939226519 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2847567896 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220246139832 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136106045547 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11361552049 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189857359613 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125518383059 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.