The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of residents’ coffee and tea purchasing and consuming in the last 4 weeks in five different cities in Australia.
Overall, it is clear from the chart that except for Adelaide, people living in other countries tended to go to a café to have coffee or tea more. Additionally, the rate of people buying instant coffee in the last 4 weeks was always higher than that of fresh coffee in all five cities.
In terms of Melbourne and Sydney, the percentage of people going to a cafe to have coffee or tea in Melbourne was highest, at over 60%, compared to more than 50% of Brisban. At the same time, about 45% of Sydney’s citizens had a habit of buying instant coffee, while the figure for Melbourne was slightly higher, at almost 50%. The proportions of people buying fresh coffee in Sydney and Melbourne were about 44% and 43%, respectively.
In terms of the three remaining cities, having coffee or tea at a cafe accounted for the largest percentage of people in Hobart, followed by Brisbane and Adelaide, at approximately 55% and 39%, respectively. Simultaneously, around 53% of people in both Brisbane and Hobart chose to buy instant coffee, compared to nearly 50% in Adelaide. Similarly, the percentage of people buying fresh coffee in Brisbane and Adelaide was around 34%, while Hobart’s figure was higher, at roughly 38%.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, while, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90987124464 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78936940932 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489270386266 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4047320862 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.111111111 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182562389077 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941447283765 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034733075854 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131665257393 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282912921995 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.