The given chart present the statistics on people's coffee and tea buying and drinkin habits in five cities of Australia.
Overall, in all of given 5 cities - Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart - all criteria sreveal variable results.
As it is clear from the chart, Sydney and Melbourne showed similar indicators. The amount of people, who have bought fresh coffee in last 4 weeks was 44%, while in Melbourne it was around 42%. The number of people, who have bought instant coffee for the same period of time was 45% in Sydney and 48% in Melbourne. Indicator of people, who went to cafe for coffee or tea made up 60 and 64% accordingly in the given cities.
In Brisbane and Adelaide the indicators of the first case decreased down to 34%, while the results of the second case have increased up to 53 and 50% relatively. The amount of people who went to a cafe was different for both cities: in first one it was 64%, in the second one- 55%.
The difference between the indicators of people in Hobart buying fresh coffee, people buying instant coffee and people going to cafe is coniderable- 38, 54 and 63% respectively, the last one of which is one of the highest results among given cities.
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 Words 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- Many people believe that we should protect all wild animals while others believe we should just protect some of them Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...have bought instant coffee for the same period of time was 45% in Sydney and 48% in Melbourne....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70892018779 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48748082278 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516431924883 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.900859348 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157801098313 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755729718098 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843855980871 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110276327555 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09902154056 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.