The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart gives information about the percentage of people who went to various kinds of tourist destinations, while the table illustrates places that people visited in Theme Parks in Britain in 1999.
Overall, most people paid a visit to Theme Parks and Museums & Galleries. Meanwhile, the Blackpool Pleasure Beach was the most favorite site among tourists in Theme Parks.
Looking at the pie chart, the proportion of visitors coming to Theme Parks and Museum & Galleries were almost equal, at 38% and 37%, respectively, which together accounted for three fourth of the visitors. By contrast, the figures for people who visited Historic Houses and Monuments was 16%, and only 9% of tourists were registered in Wildlife Parks and zoos.
Turning to the table, nearly of 50% people paid a visit to Blackpool Pleasure Beach, which is significantly higher than the figures for Alton Towers and Pleadureland, Southport, at 17% and 16% respectively. The same rate was recorded in Chessington World of Adventures and Legoland, Windsor, at 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-19 | dorae | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-30 | Yousuf Shimul | view | |
| 2021-10-18 | Kubraguran | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-09 | soomi2209 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-09 | soomi2209 | 89 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting 10
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 47
- Phones at school 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26946107784 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81571017715 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622754491018 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.81248182 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.714285714 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149709302854 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724899927219 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723065180215 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102372052041 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753534512275 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.