The bar chart illustrates how much minutes of three different call types people spent on telephone in UK between 1995 and 2002.
Overall, the local-fixed line calls were the highest throughout the period. It is also noted that the calls made by using mobile phone gained a huge of popularity over the time.
In 1995, the duration of national and international had 38 billions, which was 34 billions higher than that of mobiles, the lowest point. Over a course of 6 years starting from 1995, national and international calls rose gradually to 55 billions and then hit the plateau at the end of the survey. However, the conversation duration on mobile phone showed a significant increase to 45 billions in 2002 although it remained the lowest point.
In 1999, the number of minutes using local-fixed line reached a peak of the list, 90 billions after increasing gradually between 1995 to 1998. Meanwhile, this figure decreased noticeable to 72 billions and as many as that of its at the end of the period shown.
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 78
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 87
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The bar chart illustrates how much minutes of three different call types p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8901734104 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70884345637 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8869318117 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.75 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282136090033 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106537931964 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853269378809 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160586115399 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940190666046 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.