The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan
The bar chart compares the total minutes of three call types over a period of seven years.
It is clear that more time was spent on fixed line phone calls than those via mobiles in each year. And the local call with fixed lines was the most popular over the same period.
In 1995, people spent approximately 72 billion minutes calling local people, which was almost double the minutes of national and international calls by fixed line. By contrast, the figure for mobiles was only 3 billion. Over the following seven years, the total amount minutes of local calls rose considerably to a peak of 90 billion in 1999 and began declining after 1999, reaching 70 billion minutes in 2002.
By 2002, minutes of national and international calls through fixed lines had increased from 38 billion to 60 billion. And the equivalent figure for mobiles rose dramatically to almost 40 billion. The difference between minutes of three types of telephone calls decreased a lot between 1995 and 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | morbymuku | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | SylviaMazhiqian | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | SylviaMazhiqian | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | SylviaMazhiqian | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | winkpx | 73 | view |
- University should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 58
- Some people believe that it s good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and giv 89
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92261904762 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46964995867 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565476190476 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7294597176 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.222222222222 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225038528039 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103735207439 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654341498722 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150649227109 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702561974488 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.