The bar graph illustrate the overall unit of all phone calls made in United Kingdom both local and international by landline or mobile phone between 1995 and 2002.
Overal, the highest telephone use was recorded in 1999, as local phone call was made using fixed line, while communication using mobile cellphone was unpopular. A noticeable gradual increase of countrywide and international calls was experienced. Steadily upward cellphone use was seen in the first 4 years of the given period, and later on there was a rapid increase.
Local calls done using landlines was most popular mode of communication in 1999, as it has a record of approximately 90 billion minute for the whole year, while mobile phones were less used, at 5 billion minutes for the year 1995 on all recorded conversations.
Despite, unpopular use of cellphone, it gradually increased for the first 4 years and later on from 1999, there was a rapid upward movement in the use of mobile phones which was almost doubling each year until it reached 40 billion minutes in 2002. International and national calls made using landline, steadily maintained upward movement throughout the period.
However, in the beginning of the given period local calls done using fixed lines increased each day, until 1999 when it began to fall to about 68 billion units in 2002.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 61
- Some high school required all student to wear school uniform other higher school permit student to decide what to wear to school. 67
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 84
- Today, high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 67
- The table below describes victims by age group and offence category in Venezuela, 1999. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06787330317 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72992091702 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524886877828 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.1978038675 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0771457529689 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409583892664 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0212861854528 0.0843802449381 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0503119211625 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177593339385 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.