The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar chart and table illustrate export of a nation with changes by rate in 5 categories from 2015 to 2016. Looking from overall perspective, petroleum products dominated the chart while revenue from textiles export was the lowest. Moreover, all the range of categories underwent a rise, apart from the figure for valuable goods.
Regarding to earnings from export, petroleum merchandise started at 60 billions in 2015, which was major in the chart, then, it rose by just 2 billions remaining its position in next year. Country’s revenue from engineer goods experienced a moderate increase from 58 to 61 billions, which had the same upward trend with agricultural merchandises and textiles by 1 billions and over 5 billions respectively. In contrast, the figure for gems and jewelry fell from 42 billions to 40 billions for a year.
Moving to the table, textiles export witnessed the highest climb rate at over 15%, which followed by goods for engineering at 8.5%. In 2015-2016 period, the percentage rise in products of agriculture was the most trivial by nearly 1%, which has roughly 2% lower than that of petroleum goods.
Interestingly, while textiles was minor in nation’s total export earnings from 2015 to 2016, its percentage change was the highest among others.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-29 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 84 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 80 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 73 view
2023-12-09 Tosyne 78 view
Essays by user Nguyen Thuy Anh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... trivial by nearly 1%, which has roughly 2% lower than that of petroleum goods. ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, moreover, regarding, then, while, apart from, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18660287081 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81040918051 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4658783705 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.444444444 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195981902273 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101477740083 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103011153123 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140311850727 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638716809165 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.