The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The chart illustrates the amount of money earning by exports for a specific country between 2015 and 2016. It is made up of 5 groups. The table gives information about the proportion of change in each group for the same period analyzed.
There was an increase in the amount of money earning in 4 to 5 categories, where petroleum products, engineered goods, agricultural products, and textiles showed a rose in their income during this time. In the other hand, gems and jewellery was the only group that had a contraction in its earning.
Comparing the four categories who got earning during this period. It is interesting to note that Textiles was the category which most money made between 2015 and 2016. It reached a 15.24% of income while Agricultural products had the lowest income with an increase of 0.81%.
However, this country had a group that did not get earning over this period. In fact, Gems and jewellery had a decrease of 5.18% in its earnings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- universities and the public would benefit if professors appear on TV 66
- The cost of flying has decreased significantly over the last decade This has made overseas travel much more accessible Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 73
- Some people believe it is better to study subjects that have practical applications Others however think it is better to study subjects that are theoretical 56
- the table below shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on four common categories in the UK in 1998 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, well, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84939759036 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63872613183 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560240963855 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0419562752 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212452918559 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075993604288 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837538590939 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119016989215 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882620854268 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.