The bar chart demonstrates the amount of waste collected by a recycling centre over five consecutive starting in 2011 and culminating in 2015.
As can be seen from the bar chart, the total quantity of waste collected each year followed similar trends and only fluctuated slightly. In addition to that, while the waste paper was the most collected type of recyclable waste, the contrast was true for garden waste during the period.
In 2011, the paper makes up the most percentage within under 60 tons, while about 50 tons of glass was collected. Meanwhile, there were approximately 35 tons of discarded tin accumulated, and plastic waste remains its lowest position with 32 tons.
The amount of collected waste paper hit the lowest point of nearly 40 tons in 2013 before reaching its peak in 2015, which was the highest figure for all observed years. The figure of the paper continued to be the most collected within 4 types of waste with 70 tons. At that point, the other kinds of waste all witnessed fluctuations throughout the period, with 52 tons of glass, 39 tons of tin and 35 tons of garden waste being collected over the last few years.
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 92
- More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes car and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76884422111 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51269346394 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582914572864 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0850047275 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190200875354 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965439551949 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659136207161 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14162590551 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746153863492 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.