The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015.
The bar chart provided depicts the waste collection by a recycling center over a period of 5 years from 2011 to 2015.
Overall, it is evident that waste collected from 4 materials witnessed an upward trend after a period surveyed.
As can be seen from the bar chart given, there was a plummet of the figure for paper from 2011 to 2013 and then it showed a surge to reach a peak of about 70 tons of waste in 2015.There was a negative correlation between the figure for paper and that of glass, in which the former crashed to almost 40 tons and the latter rose slightly to merely 48 tons to rank in the first in 2013. The figure for glass fluctuated dramatically before peaking at approximately 52 tons in 2015.
As far as the bar chart is concerned, waste from tins and garden were lower compared to the remaining figures. The data for tins witnessed some considerable fluctuations but it still remained under 40 tons of waste. The figure for garden always ranked in the fourth position which hit a bottom out at about 15 tons in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 European countries in 3 years and compares with the European average 64
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 59
- Many people believe that the public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their money on expensive hi tech media such as software DVD s or videos Do you agree or disagree 84
- The illustration shows information about how igloo is build from snow 84
- Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
... peak of about 70 tons of waste in 2015.There was a negative correlation between the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49473684211 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49906353652 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573684210526 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.8236351648 43.030603864 225% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276738671587 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135794515406 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136701455576 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202849524124 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133535066567 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.