The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015.
The column chart illustrates how much of waste collecting by a recycling centre over five consecutive years, starting in 2011.
Overall, while the figure for the paper was consistently the highest from 2011 to 2021, and from 2014 to 2015, the majority of waste in 2013 belonged to glass. In addition, throughout these years, the waste garden was always the least among the four categories.
As can be seen from the column chart, the paper was the most waste collected by the recycling centre in 2015, which accounted for 70 tons. Next came the number of paper in 2011, at 57 tons, which was 17 tons as large as that in 2013, at 40 tons. Also, the figures for waste paper in 2012 (50 tons) and in 2014 (51 tons) were marginal. It is noticeable that the gaps between the numbers of waste glass did not change a lot for all observed years, which made up approximately 6 tons.
Regarding the last two kinds of waste, the number of collected waste tins hit the lowest point of 27 tons in 2007. Nevertheless, that of other years were fluctuated slightly, such as 35 tons in 2011, 34 tons in 2013, 33 tons in 2014, and 39 tons in 2015. Consequently, the largest number of the waste garden was in 2015, at just 35 tons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 74
- The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia present and in future 84
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 84
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, nevertheless, regarding, so, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44394618834 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42914429826 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547085201794 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0766823962 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.1 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300499604641 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131997810278 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115746456651 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21205612705 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730442091547 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.78 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.