The chart below shows the water levels in reservoirs of 6 cities in Australia in October 2009 and 2010

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the water levels in reservoirs of 6 cities in Australia in October 2009 and 2010.

The bar chart given compares and contrasts the levels of water in reservoirs of six different Australian countries in October 2009 and 2010. In can be clearly seen that four out of six cities witnessed an upward trend while Darwin experienced a decrease and Brisbane remained the same in the water levels. Moreover, the highest maximum percentage was recoreded in Canberra in both years.
In October 2009, there was roughly 80% of water stored in reservoirs in both Sydney and Canberra, which was the greatest proportion during this period of time. Darwin got the third rank with 45%. Besides, the percentage of water in Perth was nearly as high as that in Darwin. Lastly, the water levels in Melbourne was a quarter of that in Sydney and Canberra.
One year later, Canberra continued holding the first position in the water levels with almost 100%. Sydney came in the second with little change recorded compared to the previous year. Meanwhile, Perth and Melbourne underwent a sharp increase at 70% and 40% respectively. While the maximum of water proportion in Darwin hit a trough, that figure in Brisbane stayed unchanged.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-26 tieuquynh 84 view
2023-08-10 Anne020304 73 view
2023-08-10 Anne020304 11 view
2023-08-10 Anne020304 73 view
2023-08-06 wwwdung 78 view
Essays by user wwwdung :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...was the greatest proportion during this period of time. Darwin got the third rank with 45%. Be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, lastly, moreover, second, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55567255338 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579787234043 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8530698902 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4545454545 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0909090909 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240995334696 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840141300975 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106283442245 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162701079599 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077766980155 0.0819641961636 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.