The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting t

Essay topics:

The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart illustrates different types of jobs of Anthropology post-graduate students from one university and the additional table depicts salaries of them after 5 years' work.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that full-time workers accounted for the highest proportion regarding various destination after graduating, while unknown and students with full-time postgrad study had the lowest percentage. Graduates who worked in government sector or as a freelance consultant earned significantly higher than private companies.
Regarding the kinds of jobs post-graduate students chose, full-time jobs constituted slightly over 50%, three and four times higher than that figure of part-time and unemployed students, which were 15% and 12% respectively. Both the proportion of full-time postgrad study and unknown were 8%, while students with a combination of part-time work and postgrad study was at a lower level of 5%.
Considering the salaries of Anthropology graduates in work after five years, 40% of employees worked as freelance consultant earned either $75,000-99,000 or 100,000+, whereas the figures of government sector workers were 30% and 50% respectively. While the percentage of employees working for private companies for the two aforementioned salary range was marginally lower, the number of graduates earned 50,000-74,999 was significantly higher than other types of employment.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-08 nguyendangquang.aspect view
2023-10-05 dhphuc7866 73 view
2023-09-19 steveminh 84 view
2023-07-17 Bùi Xuân Tiến 50 view
2023-06-25 Dipesh1234 73 view
Essays by user darklord1611 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89805825243 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19394235883 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577669902913 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.1343033784 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.571428571 112.824112599 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4285714286 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158977389871 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907841127501 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997204147544 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131708961911 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112929855922 0.0819641961636 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 61.2550243902 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 11.4140731707 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.