The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of households owning and renting accommodation in Wales and England from 1918 to 2011.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that there was an upward trend regarding households living in their own accommodation, whereas the percentage of rented residences decreased significantly.
In 1918, the number of households with rented accommodation was about 78%, nearly fourfold that proportion of owned residences, which was stood at just over 20%. The percentage of households with their own houses then increased steadily, reaching 50% in a 53-year period, whereas on the contrary, rented accommodation fell sharply to 50% in the same time.
From 1971 to 2011, households in owned residences continued rising rapidly, hitting a peak of slightly under 70%, followed by a marginal decline to finish the period at approximately 64%. By contrast, the figure of rented accommodation kept on decreasing until reaching its lowest level at just over 30% before experiencing a slight increase to 35%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-02-23 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
2023-12-31 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
2023-12-31 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
2023-11-26 | lethianhthu | 67 | view |
2023-05-27 | Jessie1526 | view |
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people believe that it is a good idea that older people continue to work if it is possible for them to do Do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 50
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, then, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47852760736 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1430089126 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638036809816 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.1602556807 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.833333333 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239666668659 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136061387817 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103975527168 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174917965765 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111853372729 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.