The chart gives information about the amount of oil discovered worldwide from 1950 to 2020.
The bar chart illustrates the disparity in the amount of exploited oil on the global scale between 1950 and 2020.
Generally, during the first ten years, the figure experienced an upward trend, whereas throughout the rest of the described term, the figured had a downward trend.
Particularly, the amount of oil discovered in 1950 accounted at 20 billion barrels, before increasing to over 45 billion barrels in the preceded ten years, and reaching peak at 58 billion barrels in 1965. However, in 1970, the amount dropped significantly to 35 billion barrels, and then continued to decline by nearly ten billion barrels in 1980. It was recorded that there was around 15 billion barrels of oil exploited in 1985. that amount decrease substantially to 8 billion barrels during the next ten years. Therefore, there is a considerable increase in 2000 with 19 billion barrels of oil discovered in that years, but in 2015, the figure decreased dramatically to less than five billion barrels, prior to being predicted to drop by 1 billion barrels in 2020.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 61
- Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication Do the benefits of this outweigh the problems 86
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003. 73
- Nowadays, the traditions and customs relating to the food we eat and the way we eat are changing. Why is it happening? Do you think this kind of change is positive or negative? 56
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 432, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...llion barrels of oil exploited in 1985. that amount decrease substantially to 8 bill...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, then, therefore, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08045977011 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80596348881 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563218390805 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9887571439 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.285714286 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151937295585 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883157981668 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854913885354 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130096904048 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115511459436 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.