The presented line chart compares the temporal changes in fast food consumption patterns among Mauritian adolescents for three popular items: hamburgers, pizza, and fried chicken, over a span of thirty years.
In general, the data shows a marked increase in the frequency of hamburgers and fried chicken consumption among Mauritian teenagers, while the frequency of pizza consumption experiences a substantial decline throughout the period in question.
In 1985, pizza was the most frequently consumed fast food item among Mauritian adolescents, with a yearly frequency of 60 times, whereas hamburgers and fried chicken were only consumed 10 and 5 times per year, respectively. However, after 15 years, all three types of fast food were consumed at a similar frequency of around 40 times per year in the year 2000.
Between 2000 and 2015, the number of times Mauritian teenagers consumed hamburgers rose significantly, reaching a peak of 70 times per year. In contrast, the frequency of pizza consumption saw a significant decline, dropping to only 10 times per year in 2015. The consumption of fried chicken experienced a sharp jump by 20 times before stabilizing at approximately 60 times per year until the end of the period.
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- The graph below gives information about the technology that households in one US city used for watching television between 2004 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31632653061 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00785103466 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.3570866141 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.857142857 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111604789968 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619548223879 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278380462807 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761320660704 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284894284794 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31632653061 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00785103466 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.3570866141 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.857142857 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111604789968 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619548223879 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278380462807 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761320660704 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284894284794 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.