The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set up.
The table compares the estimated money which will be spent on three envionmental campaigns to sustain the forests in three different regions over the next five years, and the pie chart illustrates expenditure which is predicted to allocate to four operational aspects to launch the project in the first year.
It is clear that South-east Asia is received the strongest notice with the largest amount of money compared to two remaining areas. It is also noticeable that salaries will be the main cost for the project in year 1.
In South-east Asia, 30 million dollars is estimated to support the environmental campains in the first year, and the projected numbers for the following years increase significantly and reach 50 million dollars in the final year. In contrast, the anticipated costs for West Africa and the Central America will be much lower, with 10.5 million and 20 million dollars respectively. These figures are also projected to decrease to just under 5 millions dollars in the final years.
Employee’s salaries are the most important category which will take up half of all estimated costs in Year 1. 30% of the total money is projected to spend on set-up costs, while training and office expenses will account for the same proportion with only 10% each.
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 84
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information about the technology that households in one US city used for watching television between 2004 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 26.3917525773 114% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 937.175257732 114% => OK
No of words: 212.0 206.0 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02830188679 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6881826751 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 127.690721649 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580188679245 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 290.88556701 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 16.3608247423 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.5172851151 44.8134815571 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.25 76.5299724578 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 16.8248392259 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 4.34317383033 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351619351794 0.216113520407 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146646656279 0.0766984524023 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100622665088 0.0603063233224 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200224843286 0.12726935374 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065053398473 0.0580467560999 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 8.37731958763 185% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 70.7449484536 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 7.45979381443 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 8.71597938144 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 7.59969072165 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 41.2886597938 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 8.54432989691 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.