The given line graph represents the number of hamburgers, Pizza and Fried Chicken that teenagers in Mauritius consumed between 1985 and 2015.
What stands out from the graph is that while hamburgers and fried chicken witnessed an upward trend, the opposite trend was for Pizza. Obviously, the amount of pizza eaten by Mauritian teenagers declined sharply over the period shown.
In 1985, Pizza was the most favorite junk food of teenagers in Mauritius with 60 times, followed by hamburgers (10 times) and fried chicken (5 times) which was below one tenth comparing with pizza. Over the years surveyed his kind of food lost it popularity and became the least favorite of the three in 2015.
From the least wanted food among teenagers in Mauritius, fried chicken climbed up significantly in the first 20 years before experiencing a stability and ended by a slight surge about 63 times in 2015. Hamburgers had a leap which was 7 times higher than that of the first year in the last year at over 70 times per year and make it had the opposite growth to pizza.
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 61
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The table shows the percentages of adults in urban and rural a areas who took part in 4 fee time activities in 1990 and 2010 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, as for, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7868852459 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43817519041 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562841530055 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9937636322 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.142857143 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145627108463 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769452519302 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473926380846 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966353043405 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384562954097 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.