The chart makes a comparison of the amount of time spent by offspring with their parents on the weekdays and on the weekends in five different age groups.
The chart makes a comparison of the amount of time spent by offspring with their parents on the weekdays and on the weekends in five different age groups.
In general, all age groups of children always had a greater amount of time with their mom on the weekdays than the figure for their dad and both of them. In addition, unlike on weekdays, on the weekends, children in all age groups always spent the largest amount of time with both their parents.
Looking at the weekdays, the amount of time spent by children with mom was always around 4 to 6 hours. By contrast, the figure for male counterparts is rather low, at almost 2 hours and the most time spent by the 4-5 group. Meanwhile, children devoted little time to both their parents, only around 1 to 2 hours per day and the age group 6-9 had the highest amount of bonding time with their parents.
Moving to the weekends, about 4 to 6 hours a day was the amount of time spent by children with both spouses. Children almost spent no time with their father, with the highest amount being at just over 1 hour for the 4-5 group. Finally, the number of hours expended by children with their mom was always around at 4 hours in all age ranges .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-20 | quochung95.ftu2@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- Generally speaking public transport represented the highest percentage of phone usage and family feasts recorded the least phone productivity Additionally elders relied on their phones less than others 84
- The chart makes a comparison of the amount of time spent by offspring with their parents on the weekdays and on the weekends in five different age groups 61
- The pie chart displays the changes in the proportion of water consumption and the bar chart illustrates the changes in the percentage of water use in Australia in 2004
- In conclusion although some people are in favour of sharing academic knowledge freely I strongly believe that the government should enact more suitable policies in order to guarantee the benefit for companies and individuals 84
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by children with both spouses. Children almost spent no time with their father, ...
^^
Line 7, column 340, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ways around at 4 hours in all age ranges .
^^
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s around at 4 hours in all age ranges .
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43243243243 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24778664307 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.400900900901 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.84673283 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500984502381 0.215688989381 232% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.271479988947 0.103423049105 262% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.224992787767 0.0843802449381 267% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.42695732822 0.15604864568 274% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.265382764254 0.0819641961636 324% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.