The chart shows British emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007.
The chart below depicts the British people who moved in distinct countries. The data is calibrated in thousands.
The most striking feature to be observed is that Australia was the most prevalent nation for immigration compare to other nations.
It can be vividly seen that, in 2004, Australia had highest 40,000 thousands followed by Spain and USA with 35,000 , 25,000 thousands respectively. In the same year New Zealand and France stood at the same position. In 2005, France was the second highest country after Australia where more British people immigrant. Further, in 2006, Australia led with largest 55,000 thousands whereas Spain and France occupied second and third position with 35,000, 25,000 thousands people.
Turning to rest of description, in the year of 2007, New Zealand stood at the lowest position with 20,000 thousands people only. As far as comparison is concerned ,in 2006, the number of immigrants was doubled in Australia compare to New Zealand. The data was same in 2007 among New Zealand, USA, and France compare to other years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | nhim22122005 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | catimphithang | view | |
| 2023-03-26 | tata | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | tata | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-03 | sandeepjohal96@gmail.com | view |
- Nowadays more people are living by themselves. what are the reason for this. is this have a negative or positive impact on this day. 78
- the line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999. 61
- some people say that online study is the most effective and convenient way to learn. others believe that online study will never be effective as learning at school in person. discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- the bar chart below show the participation of children in selected leisure activities. 78
- some people believe that it is important to give gifts and presents to friends and family to show that we are care about them. others think that there are better ways to show affection to them. discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he data is calibrated in thousands. The most striking feature to be observed is...
^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Australia was the most prevalent nation for immigration compare to other nations...
^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...een that, in 2004, Australia had highest 40,000 thousands followed by Spain and U...
^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ds followed by Spain and USA with 35,000 , 25,000 thousands respectively. In the s...
^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iption, in the year of 2007, New Zealand stood at the lowest position with 20,000...
^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... only. As far as comparison is concerned ,in 2006, the number of immigrants was do...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21637426901 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54913849857 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0681804247 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0633684900682 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301295505469 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384237796285 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0459517637827 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392925121553 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.