The chart shows the different ways of dealing with the garbage in four countries
The bar chart illustrates how to dispose the garbage by four different ways in Netherlands、Italy、Spain and the UK.
It is clear that the most frequent way of coping with garbage used by the UK、Italy and Spain is landfill,（60%、about 50% and 45% respectively）followed by the way of recycling. And the percentage of recycling in Spain is the same as in the UK (around 30%). In terms of burning, 20% of the garbage is coped with by this mean in Italy and Spain, which is much more than that of in the UK. In the aspect of biologically treated, Italy and Spain have the same percentage as well (around 5%).
However, the most popular instrument of handling garbage in Netherlands is recycling (more than 40%), with the measures of burning following closely (40%). Different from the other three countries, the way of landfill accounts for only about 5% in Netherlands, and it is the last measure to take in this country.
Overall, the percentage of landfill ranks first in the UK, whereas the rest measurements all rank first in Netherlands.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The chart shows the different ways of dealing with the garbage in four countries 67
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The chart shows the different ways of dealing with the garbage in four countries 56
- Thechart showsthedifferentwaysofdealingwiththegarbageinfourcountries 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, well, whereas, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94943820225 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.64964506526 2.65546596893 137% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533707865169 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4394258853 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209894354117 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929602763373 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980363511746 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138326835895 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108871091547 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.