Some people believe that spending money on developing technology for space exploration is unjustifiable, there are more beneficial ways to spend money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Large amounts of money have been spent on technology for space exploration programmes since several decades. Although I agree with that it makes sense to spend money on space exploration, the funds should also be allocated to other aspects like public services.
On one hand, I suppose that space exploration is very likely to help human being to cope with the problem of resources. It is deniable that traditional resources will run out in the future. Exploiting rare resources in outer space is necessary since it can relieve the shortage of resources. Further, faced with population explosion and degradation, scientists need to seek for a suitable habitat for human in extra-terrestrial space.
On the other hand, I hold that it is unsound to pay most of the funds for space programmes. Space programmes, including training astronauts and manufacturing spaceships come at huge costs to government, increasing the financial burden of the governments. In addition, many projects make little progress and it turns out taxing and unrewarding. It means it is difficult to benefit the masses. However, if the massive money goes to vital public services instead, it will have great outcomes. Compared to space programmes, spending money on technology for public services is easier to gain fruit having impacts on everyone. For example, Intelligent Transportation System which can strengthen the connection between people、cars and roads is of great beneficial to ordinary people due to improving traffic congestions. It gives people better quality of life.
In conclusion, my view is that the massive funds should be spent on services which can benefit most people in their daily life rather than space exploration, a project which is a waste of money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | Oliviachenlu | 91 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Oliviachenlu | 71 | view |
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others What types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 70
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950-2002,withprojectionsto2050. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t for human in extra-terrestrial space. On the other hand, I hold that it is uns...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, for example, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34050179211 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01511886857 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5770609319 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7644209209 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245771214552 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739492400585 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657511927281 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14937820057 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709707579849 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.