The chart shows the hours per week spent watching TV by gender and by age group in 2011 in Australia. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparation where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of time both genders spent watching films in 2001 in Australia.
Overall, it is clear that there was an increase in all females of age, except girls aged 36-45. In addition, the opposite was true with both gender at this age in 2001.
The figures for adolescent under 15 age was highest, at 25 hours, and higher than that for male, at 15 hours each week spent watching movies. Followed by the female in 15-25 age and middle age was equally recorded at 20 hours, but the amount of time of males aged 15-25 and over 55 was 18 and 16 hours, respectively, which lower than that of females.
Standing at the lowest level, the females aged 36-45 accounted for 10 hours compared to the males-only at 7 hours. At the same time, there was no significant disparity between both gender in the 26-35 and 46-55 age
with females 17 and 18 hours and males 16 and 15 hours, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-16 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | jadenguyen | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation 82
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 78
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person so medical service should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems 56
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55421686747 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37609178365 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572289156627 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9735542046 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145694165146 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876236872892 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417018445823 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961067582203 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473378899612 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.