The given chart gives information about the frequency of eating at junk food restaurants in the USA from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, most of the Americans had a meal once a week in 2003 and 2006. However, the highest frequency of consuming fast-food belongs to one or twice in a month in 2013.
At first, in 2003, whereas having instant food every week had the most proportion (approximately 32%), that of every day and never junk food were the least with 4% and 5% respectively. Next, the frequency of consuming instant food for one time a week reached its maximum percentage to 35% in 2006 which was followed by a downward trend in 2013. In the same manner, several times a week figure started at about 17% and then peaked at 20% in 2006 and experience a fall in 2013. Both the proportion of every day and never eating decreased by approximately 1% in 2006 and then did not change over the following next 7 years.
Moreover, having junk food once or twice a week stood at vicinity of 30% in 2003 after which it reduced by 5% in 2006. After this, it made the most frequency at 33% in 2013. Similarly, a few time a year had an upward trend between 2003 and 2006. It saw a small rise in 2006 and it remained static in 2013.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 56
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 187, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
... frequency at 33% in 2013. Similarly, a few time a year had an upward trend between 2003...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, similarly, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37719298246 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46731480592 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504385964912 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.690121042 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7272727273 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196592733009 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847936104388 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700294847558 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157332014838 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724288207254 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.