The given bar chart illustrates how often Americans are in gas food restaurants within a ten year period of 2003 to 2013.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest proportion of people are in restaurants once a week or once or twice a month and the least percentage of people go to gas food restaurants every day within the given time period.
In 2003, approximately 5% of the people are in the restaurants every day. The percentage of people who are outside their home for !t least once a week is just above 30% while those who ate out just a few times in the year were less than15%. 5% of the population never eat in fast-food restaurants. Similarly, in 2006, less than 5% go out to eat every day while roughly about 32% of people prefer to eat out once a week and less than 5% never went to a fast-food restaurant.
However, six years (2013) down the line, the pattern did not change for everyday goers but the proportion of people who to eat in fast-food restaurants at least once a week dropped significantly to about 27%. Those who go out once or twice a year increased considerably to over 30% compared to the years. Consistently, those who went to the restaurants a few times a year remained constant at 15% since 2006. Furthermore, about 4% never went to any fast-food restaurants.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- Frequency of eating at fast food restaurants among people in the usa 33
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.You should write at least 150 words. 67
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by sell and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows how geothemal energy is used to produce electricity. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 't the least'.
Suggestion: t the least
... people who are outside their home for !t least once a week is just above 30% while tho...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, similarly, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52340425532 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75570604365 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476595744681 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8721372906 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249598847485 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118900395148 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763843970845 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176250980801 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522813569333 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.