The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of people of the USA, that's how often, they went to the fast food restaurants in the period of 2003, 2006 and 2013.
Overall, the graph depicts that most of the USA citizens were eating fast food at restaurants in various times. However, eating at once a week was popular at 2006, where, after 7 years, people loved to go the fast food restaurants in once or twice a month.
Turning to the graph in more details, in 2013 around 33% people were eating at fast food restaurants once or twice a month, while a similar number of citizens went restaurants once a week in 2006. Earlier, in 2003 people who ate fast food between once a week and once a or twice a month that varied at 1%. The proportion of people had become poor who went once a month and twice in 2006, which stands 25%, in contrast with, frequency of eating at fast food restaurants at once a week at 27% in 2013.
Furthermore, in terms of several times a week for eating fast food at the shops were favorable (20%) in 2006 among other time periods and in case of, 2003 and 2013 the rate stands at around 17% and 16% respectively. On the other hand, folks of the USA had eaten at 13% in a few times a year, after three years, the figure of this category people were rising at 15% and it remains same till 2013. The percentage rate for every day eating fast foods and. The percentage rate for every day eating fast foods and never ate persons were similar which 5% in the three mentioned years.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 67
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...es the percentage of people of the USA, thats how often, they went to the fast food r...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...06 and 2013. Overall, the graph depicts that most of the USA citizens were eati...
^^
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h depicts that most of the USA citizens were eating fast food at restaurants in ...
^^
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wever, eating at once a week was popular at 2006, where, after 7 years, people lo...
^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stands 25%, in contrast with, frequency of eating at fast food restaurants at on...
^^
Line 4, column 414, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for everyday'?
Suggestion: for everyday
...ins same till 2013. The percentage rate for every day eating fast foods and. The percentage r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 471, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for everyday'?
Suggestion: for everyday
...ing fast foods and. The percentage rate for every day eating fast foods and never ate persons...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 281.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32740213523 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26349626838 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444839857651 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3621612956 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.6 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324657522757 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171145218511 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964999860163 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253168611628 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100944757695 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.13 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...es the percentage of people of the USA, thats how often, they went to the fast food r...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...06 and 2013. Overall, the graph depicts that most of the USA citizens were eati...
^^
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h depicts that most of the USA citizens were eating fast food at restaurants in ...
^^
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wever, eating at once a week was popular at 2006, where, after 7 years, people lo...
^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stands 25%, in contrast with, frequency of eating at fast food restaurants at on...
^^
Line 4, column 414, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for everyday'?
Suggestion: for everyday
...ins same till 2013. The percentage rate for every day eating fast foods and. The percentage r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 471, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for everyday'?
Suggestion: for everyday
...ing fast foods and. The percentage rate for every day eating fast foods and never ate persons...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 281.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32740213523 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26349626838 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444839857651 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3621612956 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.6 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324657522757 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171145218511 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964999860163 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253168611628 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100944757695 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.13 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.