The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on fuel Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on fuel.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The line chart illustrates the statistics of people of US and UK who spend money by using fuels.
Overall, The poorest people of the United States spend more money on fuels than the richest people. From the beginning, American citizens are using fuels with high proportions.
However, in UK the wealthy respondents are used more fuels than the poorest.
In the chart, we can see that, British people with low incomes using 0.5% fuels in the beginning. While around 4% the lowest income public has spent money on fuels which sharply rise at 5.5%. The middle-income group of both country citizens are spending approximately 3.7% of their money on fuels with in a time.
In terms of the richest people of US who less spend their money on fuels and the trends are gradually dropped at 2.5%, while similarity shows in the trend of high-incomed respondents in the Britain which fall at 3.1%. Comparatively, more usages than the wealthy public of The United States.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-01 mahaalarfaj 61 view
Essays by user ismatjahan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are using fuels with high proportions. However, in UK the wealthy respondents a...
^^^
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...omes using 0.5% fuels in the beginning. While around 4% the lowest income public has ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87195121951 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56841978469 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542682926829 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9853001906 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7777777778 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133676447223 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661165923289 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495313219475 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828442101875 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044862579664 0.0819641961636 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.