The bar chart compares the percentages in terms of the number of international students from four countries between 2004 to 2008.
It’s clear that there was a dramatic decrease can be seen in China over the four-year period, while America saw a significant growing trend at the same time. Russia’s figure remained at the lowest level during the whole time.
In 2004, around 27,500 students from China studying at European universities. However, the numbers saw a trend of a sharp fall and dropped by approximately 12,5000 people by 2008. In 2006, the figures were the same in both China and America, with nearly 18,000 students. Over the following two years, American applicants took over that of China and increased to a peak at 27,500 in 2008, the same as the Chinese data in 2004.
People from Japan, as the third largest group, were merely as half as the number of American in 2004 around 6,000. The data remained the same in the following year, and started to rise steadily until reaching to 10,000 in the year 2008. The number for Russia roughly stayed stable at the same level on average at 2,500 at all times, contributing the least proportion.
- Fashion has become more and more important when people choose clothes. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 89
- The line graph shows three different crimes in England and Wales in 1970-2005. 73
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 78
- An increasing number of people are changing their careers What are the reasons Do you think it is positive or negative 91
- .The food travels thousands of miles from farm to consumer. Some people think it would be better to our environment and economy if people only ate local produced food. What extent do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89949748744 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56198626891 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577889447236 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8131914234 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254052415965 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110802496162 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139021330398 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198569774114 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172067700446 0.0819641961636 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.