The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016
The given bar chart illustrates the proportion of Australian small, medium and large enterprises engaging in social media usage for commercial purposes over the course of 5 years, from 2012 to 2016.
Overall, large companies had the tendency to employ social networks the most as their rate stayed consistently above 50% during the given time frame. Another observable trend would be the unceasing rise of social media utilization among all subjects of study, with a minor setback of the year 2015 when such figures of the 3 groups simultaneously took a dive.
In 2012, large corporations utilized the most out of social networking sites, at a staggering 80% while only around 30% of small and medium companies used social media to achieve their economic goals. In the next 2 years, however, small and medium firms witnessed a growth of approximately 8% and 17% respectively in media usage whereas such figure of large corporations, in contrast, displayed a marginal decrease of 3%.
In 2015, a collective and significant decline could be observed in the rate of exploiting social media among 3 types of company as the rates for small and medium businesses dropped to 30% while that of large firms hit its bottom at roughly 54%. This trend didn’t last long, however, for these figures quickly bounced back to almost 50% for small firms, 55% for medium firms and 80% for large firms in 2016.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-18 | nlinh03101 | 84 | view |
- The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 78
- The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 87
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...displayed a marginal decrease of 3%. In 2015, a collective and significant decl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00854700855 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67719268162 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58547008547 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.11813475 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.428571429 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4285714286 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246642282804 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115332005062 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621542416774 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155829909889 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457809739745 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.