The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts in combination indicate the hobbies that European adults are most interested in between 1985 and 1995.
Overall, European Adults in 1995 had more partime activities than that in 1985. Notably, watching TV was the most prevalent in aforementioned period.
As can be observed, the most chosen options of European Adults in 1985 was watching TV, talking with friends, talking with family; meanwhile, in addtion to the two former activities, European Adults in 1995 also enjoyed mostly playing computer games. In particular, 32% and 30% was the proportion of people choosing watch TV in their free time in 1985 and 1995, which outnumbered that choosing talk with friends by 3 to 2 and by 6 to 5 respectively. Noticeably, the figure for talking with family was 18% in 1985-one of the top-choice activities; meanswhile, European people in 1995 wasn’t enjoy it, they prefered playing computer games occupying 27% instead.
Regarding the lesser values, the percentage of people enjoying eat out was 18% in 1985 but it saw a sharply decrese whose figure was still 8% in 1995. Similarity, the other activities accounted for small number between 2 years, 6% and 2% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008
- The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 84
- The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 78
- The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to watch'
Suggestion: to watch
...% was the proportion of people choosing watch TV in their free time in 1985 and 1995,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, regarding, so, still, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14358974359 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85790597492 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610256410256 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1565563718 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.375 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168859159689 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897387896202 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777236243698 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131924059972 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660409492035 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.