The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010
The bar chart compares male and female teachers in terms of six levels of educational setting in the UK in 2010, measured by percentage. Overall, females outnumbered males in three first types of education, whereas there were male-dominated figures in college, institute and university levels.
In some sorts of education under college, there were the remarkable gaps between two genders. The percentages were nine times as many females as male teachers in nursery and primary school, around 90% and 10% respectively. However, in secondary school, female teachers only accounted for over 50% while the others made up to 45%, it can be seen that difference was inconsiderable.
By contrast, men and women were more equally represented in the other levels, except for university degree. In college, the data in both genders were exactly the same, 50% for each one. Furthermore, 55% of males taught in private training institute, compared to 45% of females worked at this place. The last one is the university, it illustrated a significant gap, where the figure of men was more than two times higher than that of women, 70% and 30% respectively.
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 73
- Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this been a positive or negative development? 84
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 71
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 89
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13368983957 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89667845806 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657754010695 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0814097846 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296520630612 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113757305748 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142551709523 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214311195243 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161254690273 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.