The chart shows the percentage of people who accessed news from 4 sources from 1995 and projection to 2025

Essay topics:

The chart shows the percentage of people who accessed news from 4 sources from 1995 and projection to 2025

The given line chart illustrates the proportion of 4 different tools people use for approaching news. As can easily be seen, the general trend for Internet is upward, while the opposite was true for the rest 3 sources. This general move is expected to remain for the next 3 years.
Nearly 70% of people accessed news through Television in 1995, but this figures rapidly fell to just under 60% for the next 5 years and continue to decrease at about 50% in 2020. Newspaper also experienced a steadily decrease as the percentages of people reached it’s peak at about 55% in 1995 but continuously declined to reach 30% in 2020. Radio used to be chose by 50% of people, but only under 30% use radio to approach news. All of these medias are predicted to continue to decrease in demand in 2025.
Although in 1995 nearly zero to none of people use Internet, in 2010 this proportions dramatically climbed at about 30%. This growth remaind stable for the next 10 years at 40%, and will continue to rise sharply to reach its peak in 2025 at about 55%, the highest among all.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-12-02 minh phương phạm hồng 67 view
2022-03-05 quangnguyeenx 78 view
Essays by user quangnguyeenx :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...50% in 2020. Newspaper also experienced a steadily decrease as the percentages of people reached it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58854166667 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45329086488 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598958333333 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3086877295 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130180858367 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578065403578 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455130956885 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852720669068 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367293297514 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.