The given bar chart illustrates percentages of renewable energy of the whole energy generation in 4 different nations beginning with 1997 and ending in 2010.
Overall, the amount of renewable energy supplied in both Iceland and Sweden saw an upward trend over the three examined years. In addition, Iceland’s statistics were the highest in comparison with Australia, Sweden and Turkey.
Iceland produced the greatest proportion of renewable energy which accounted for 45% (1997) then went up to 70% (2010). Ranked at the second is Turkey with its peak at 40% (2000), besides, in 1997 and 2010, this country supplied around 30% and 40%. Following are Australia and Sweden, the amount of renewable energy production of these two countries did not exceed 10% over the three years investigated.
It is clear that both Iceland and Sweden had a jump in supplying renewable energy. In contrast, during this time, Australia saw the opposite trend, its statistics fell down from nearly 10% to 5% and Turkey remained fluctuating around 30% and 40%.
- The diagram shows the process by which sheep embryis are cloned 74
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions from 1980 to 2010 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 84
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 big cities in 2000 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, second, so, then, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18934911243 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64248721844 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621301775148 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8421310629 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.625 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350295419545 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145174462564 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102583804824 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210220054096 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113674743865 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.