The chart shows requests for information at a tourist office in the United Kingdom from January to June.
The diagram depicts the frequency people contacting to tourist office to inquire about information by three methods including in person, by letter or mail and by telephone in the United Kingdom from January to June. Overall, both the number of contacts to the tourist office in person and by telephone grew substantially, whereas the number of contacts direct at the tourist office increased from the lowest to the most common, followed by telephone. By contrast, sending emails or letters to tourist office plunged considerably during this period.
In January, in-person information requests were the lowest among the 3 demographics (just over 400), after which it doubled to 800 in March and then this number rose steadily to 1000. Additionally, from mid-March onward, in-person queries increased steadily and finally ended with the number being recorded at approximately 1900 in June.
Turning to the remaining means of contact to the tourist office, telephone requests fluctuated from roughly 900 to 1000 between January and March and stayed unchanged until April before reaching 1600 in June. Notably, letter and email requests witnessed a converse pattern, the number started below 800 in January, followed by a plunge in the next 3 months (approximately 600) and finally hit bottom at about 390.
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- The chart below shows the number of people in Europe who were affected by four types of noise by day and by night in cities and rural areas in 2007 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33495145631 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74032888431 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567961165049 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.9275611956 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.0 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4285714286 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313488215113 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140668329935 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834942709331 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199051939428 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860613286961 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.