The chart shows requests for information at a tourist office in the United Kingdom from January to June.
The diagram depicts the frequency people contacting to tourist office to ask for information by three methods including in person, by letter or mail and by telephone in the United State from January to June. Overall, either number of contacts to the tourist office in person or by telephone grew substantially, whereas the number of contacts direct at the tourist office increased from the lowest to the predominant, followed by telephone. By contrast, sending emails or letters to tourist office plunged considerably during this period.
In January, in-person information requests were the lowest among the 3 demographics (just over 400), after which saw a double increase to 800 in March and then its figure rose steadily to 1000. From mid-March onward, in-person queries rocketed consistently and finally ended with the figure being recorded at approximately 1900 in June.
Turning to the remaining means of contact to the tourist office, telephone requests fluctuated from roughly 900 to 1000 between January and March and stayed unchanged until April before reaching 1600 in June. Notably, letter and email requests witnessed a converse pattern, its figure started at below 800 in January, followed by a plunge in the next 3 months (approximately 600) and finally hit a bottom at about 390.
- The chart below shows the number of people in Europe who were affected by four types of noise by day and by night in cities and rural areas in 2007 67
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think this is happening How can this issue be solved 73
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27053140097 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79135100116 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584541062802 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.4600449862 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.857142857 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332276590563 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144885996525 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808050871403 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206383458548 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845637702896 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.