The information about sales of 5 various kind of jam such as a strawberry, raspberry, grabs, cherry and plum is depicted by the rendered line chart between 2009 and 2014. The data has been calibrated in million.
To begin, the highest sales of jam was strawberry in 2009, which was 3.3 million. whereas the list portion of sales was grapes that was only 0.5 million. Raspberry cherry and plums was purchased in 2009 which was 2.5, 2.5, 1.7 million correspondingly.
Moreover, there was a dramatic rose manifested in the sales of Jam such as strawberry, raspberry and grapes by the end of 2014, it was accounted for 7, 5.5, and 4.5 million respectively. A levelling off was seen in the sales of cherry from 2009 to 2014, it was around 2 millions. The number of sales of plum jam decreased rapidly during 5 years, which makes up of 3 to 0.1 million.
Overall, it would be vividly observed that highest sales of jam was strawberry, nevertheless the list sales of jam was plum by the end of span.
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 61
- The chart shows the sales of five different kinds of jam from 2009 to 2014 73
- The chart below show the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 will projection till 2050 73
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kind' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kinds'.
Suggestion: kinds
...he information about sales of 5 various kind of jam such as a strawberry, raspberry,...
^^^^
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...d 2014. The data has been calibrated in million. To begin, the highest sales of jam ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...awberry in 2009, which was 3.3 million. whereas the list portion of sales was grapes th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...awberry in 2009, which was 3.3 million. whereas the list portion of sales was grapes th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nevertheless, whereas, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62921348315 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71473323613 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516853932584 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0826401672 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5555555556 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251447431131 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124971054632 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829802470556 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183343907341 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584042505761 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.