The chart shows UK immigration, emigration and net migration between 1999 and 2008.
The given chart gives information about UK immigration, emigration and net migration from 1999 to 2008.
It is clear that both immigration and emigration rose over the given period, while the figure for net migration largely unchanged by 2008 despite two peaks in 2004 and 2007.
By 1999, there were over 450,000 people immigrating to the UK, whereas just under 300,000 resettled down outside Britain. The figure for net migration was much lower than those figures, at about 160,000 and it remained stable before reaching the first peak of nearly 250,000 in 2004. Over the same period, immigration and emigration shared a roughly similar trend, with the numbers of the former rising to nearly 600,000 and of the latter up to approximately 380,000.
After 2004, the rate of immigration remained above 550,000 people each year; meanwhile, the number of those emigrating fluctuated. Emigration fell suddenly in 2007 and then culminated in a high of 420,000 by 2008. The net migration witnessed the second spike of around 240,00 before levelling off at the initial 160,000 people mark.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-05 | hriddhik | 80 | view |
| 2022-03-04 | hriddhik | 10 | view |
| 2022-01-02 | parkminji363 | view | |
| 2021-03-11 | camnhuq | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-21 | quanglnd31 | 78 | view |
- Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace everyday Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages 92
- What are the differences between fast food and traditional food 89
- Some people think that work is the most important aspect of people s life Without a successful career life become meaningless To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- What are the differences between fast food and traditional food 89
- The chart shows UK immigration emigration and net migration between 1999 and 2008 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21022727273 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60244019906 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642045454545 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.084881366 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308566129019 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151249307854 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120650197393 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239706992238 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123695461438 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.