The bar graph illustrates the different levels of water of six different cities located in Australia in the month October of 2009 and 2010.
Overall, expect the downward trend of Darwin and the stability of Brisbane of the water levels, every other city experienced a considerable upturn over the year, making a significant growth in percentage of Canberra.
The reservoir in Darwin witnessed a sharp dip in the water level percentage by 20% in the year 2010 making it the lowest among other reservoirs. However, the water levels in the Brisbane reservoir plateaued throughout the year.
To converse, there is an upward pattern in the remaining reservoirs. the water level in Sydney rose slightly from 75% to 82%. Melbourne which initially witnessed the lowest water level had surpassed the Darwin in the next year by 15%. Likewise, there was a moderate climb over by 20% in water storage levels of Perth and Canberra. At the end of the period, the Canberra reservoir had a significant growth making it the highest percentage of water levels.
- The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining teacher training qualifications in 2005 6 and 2006 7 and the proportion of male qualifiers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 67
- The bar charts below show UK and US energy consumption in 2000 and 2006 67
- The bar charts show the types of holiday accommodation chosen in four British countries during 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Because of traffic and housing problems in the cities the government encourages businesses to move to the rural area Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some children nowadays take sports seriously while others play sports in their free time Is this a positive or negative development Give your own opinion and examples 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...rd pattern in the remaining reservoirs. the water level in Sydney rose slightly fro...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04597701149 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72273109801 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8357238434 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370919921474 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141017812422 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763932349946 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21335888633 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606130441213 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.